Hello, and welcome to Wikisource! Thank you for joining the project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Please consider putting a brief description of yourself on your user page. If you are already a contributor to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikipedia, please mention this on your user page so we know how to contact you. Also, mention which languages you understand if English is not your first language.

In any case, I hope you enjoy donating your time to grow the Wikisource library that is free for everyone to use! In discussions, please "sign" your comments using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here (click edit) and place {{helpme}} before your question.

Again, welcome! John Vandenberg 08:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

The pages in Category:Easton's Bible Dictionary also need to be changed to use {{bbsc}} syntax. John Vandenberg 09:30, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


I recently got an e-mail to apply a bot flag to SQLBot. I was wondering if you would still like the flag (it hasn't been active for a couple weeks), and where the request for the bot flag took place. Was it originally on the Scriptorium? I just want to see what initial reception to the bot was before I decide to add the flag or not. Thanks, and I'm so sorry for the long delay.—Zhaladshar (Talk) 19:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I suppose it's been a couple / many months now. I'll ask again if I find another task. SQLQuery me! 12:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

"...This is where all my time goes..."Edit

So true! :-(  ;-)

This is a really nice tools; with it I can easily see that my bot has almost caught up to me in number of patrols[1].

This is a bit odd:

Edits (including deleted edits): 1398
Edits: 1465

How can it be that the inclusive figure is lower than the second, which gives the appearance of being less inclusive ? John Vandenberg (chat) 04:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm not honestly sure, that happens on enwiki too sometimes. How it does it, is that it queries user_editcount from the user table, to get the deleted edits + edits count, then, counts everything with your userid in the revision table. Dunno why edits would be higher... SQLQuery me! 04:25, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
The only thing I can think of are manual table drops or lotsa oversight action.... SQLQuery me! 04:26, 2 May 2008 (UTC)