Page:North Dakota Reports (vol. 48).pdf/705

This page needs to be proofread.
LANGER v. COURIER NEWS
681

number of affidavits from men who, so far as their affidavits show, were at least as well qualified to speak as those who made the affidavits for the defendants. According to these latter affidavits, defendants can obtain a fair trial in Richland county. After a hearing, the trial judge made an order denying the application for a change of venue. This appeal is taken from that order.

On this appeal, the only error assigned is that the trial judge erred in denying the defendants’ motion for a change of venue from Richland county to some other county.

Whether a change of venue should or should not be had on account of local prejudice is primarily one for the determination of the trial court. In other words, an application for a change of venue on the ground that an impartial trial cannot be had in the county where the action is pending is addressed to the sound, judicial discretion of the trial court; and the ruling made by the trial court will not be interfered with unless a manifest abuse of discretion appears. Booren v. McWilliams, 33 N. D. 339, 157 N. W. 117. “The reason for the rule is obvious. Whether a change of venue is necessary to obtain a fair and impartial trial is not a question of law, but of fact. A judge on the spot, viewing all the circumstances, and having knowledge of persons, facts and influences is much better qualified than is an appellate court at a distance, with only ex parte affidavits before it, to determine the fact whether or not it is true that the defendant cannot have a fair trial by an impartial jury in the county in which he is indicted or in which the plaintiff has commenced his suit.” 4 Ency. Pl. & Pr. 499-502. Upon the record submitted, this court is wholly unjustified in interfering with the ruling of the trial court.

Order affirmed. Christianson, Bronson}}, and Birdzell, JJ., concur.

Grace, C. J., did not participate.

Robinson, J. (dissenting). This is a political libel suit, a common nuisance case. Three times it has come before this court: (1) On appeal from.an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint; (2) a motion