Page:A History of Indian Philosophy Vol 1.djvu/381

VIII] God and Salvation 3 6 5 so Isvara knows all the purposes of this wide universe and is thus omniscient. He knows all things always and therefore does not require memory; all things are perceived by him directly without any intervention of any internal sense such as manas, etc. He is always happy. His will is eternal, and in accordance with the karma of men the same will produces dissolution, creates, or protects the world, in the order by which each man reaps the results of his own deeds. As our self which is in itself bodiless can by its will produce changes in our body and through it in the external world, so Isvara also can by his will create the universe though he has no body. Some, however, say that if any association of body with Isvara is indispensable for our con- ception of him, the atoms may as well be regarded as his body, so that just as by the will of our self changes and movement of our body take place, so also by his will changes and movements are produced in the atoms 1. The naiyayikas in common with most other systems of Indian philosophy believed that the world was full of sorrow and that the small bits of pleasure only served to intensify the force of sorrow. To a wise person therefore everything is sorrow (sarvaJ!z du{zklta1!l v£'uekina(t); the wise therefore is never attached to the so-called pleasures of life which only lead us to further sorrows. The bondage of the world is due to false knowledge (m£thya- jfzana) which consists in thinking as my own self that which is not my self, namely body, senses, manas, feelings and know- ledge; when once the true knowledge of the six padarthas and as Nyaya says, of the proofs (pramii?za), the objects of knowledge (prameya), and of the other logical categories of inference is attained, false knowledge is destroyed. False knowledge can be removed by constant thinking of its opposite (pratipaka- bhava1za), namely the true estimates of things. Thus when any pleasure attracts us, we are to think that this is in reality but pain, and thus the right knowledge about it will dawn and it will never attract us again. Thus it is that with the destruction of false knowledge our attachment or antipathy to things and ignorance about them (collectively called doa, cf. the klesa of Patanjali) are also destroyed. With the destruction of attachment actions (pra'l'rtt£) for the 1 See NYllyal1laiijari, pp. 190-204, lfvarcl1lZtllliilla of Raghunatha Siromal).i and U dayana's KUsZt11liiiijali.