Talk:Banks v. Manchester
|
This page is part of a WikiProject to improve the United States Supreme Court case pages. To participate see the project page. |
| Information about this edition | |
|---|---|
| Edition: | Banks v. Manchester, . |
| Source: | Banks v. Manchester from http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/US/128 |
| Contributor(s): | BenchBot |
| Level of progress: | Text being edited 
|
| Notes: | Gathered and wikified using an automated tool. See this documentation for more information. |
References edit
Mr. Edward L. Taylor, for appellants, cited: United States v. Hillegas’s Executors, 3 Wash. C. C. 70; Hines v. North Carolina, 10 Sm. & Marsh. 529; Mexico v. De Arangois, 5 Duer (N. Y.) 634; Wheaton v. Peters, 8 Pet. 591; Banks v. De Witt, 42 Ohio St. 264; Little v. Gould, 2 Blatchford, 362; Stationers v. Patentees about the Printing of Rolls’ Abridgment, Carter, 89; Millar v. Taylor, 4 Burrow, 2383; Basket v. University of Cambridge, 1 Wm. Bl. 105; Myers v. Callaghan, 5 Fed. Rep. 726; Gould v. Banks, 53 Conn. 415; Banks v. West Publishing Co., 27 Fed. Rep. 50.
Mr. Richard A. Harrison, for appellee, cited: United States v. Rhodes, 1 Abbott (U. S.) 28;[1] People v. Imlay, 20 Barb. 68; Gendell v. Orr, 13 Phila. 191; Miller v. Taylor, 4 Burrow, 2383; Lindsley v. Coats, 10 Ohio, 243; King v. Beck, 15 Ohio, 559; Banks v. West Publishing Co., 27 Fed. Rep. 50; Myers v. Callaghan, 5 Fed. Rep. 726; Nash v. Lathrop, 142 Mass. 29; Atwill v. Ferrett, 2 Blatchford, 39; Connecticut v. Gould, 34 Fed. Rep. 319; Gould v. Banks, 53 Conn. 415; Davidson v. Wheelock, 27 Fed. Rep. 61; Chase v. Sanborn, 4 Cliff. 306; Myers v. Callaghan, 20 Fed. Rep. 441; Banks v. Manchester, 23 Fed. Rep. 143.
Duplicate citations (between appellant’s and appellee’s) only listed for the first time.
Opinions on British copyright silver; on American copyright, green; on other law, black; duplicate citations not marked.
From the opinion:
Revised Statutes of Ohio, edition of 1879, pp. 273, 274; 78 Laws of Ohio, for 1881, p. 14; 79 Laws of Ohio, for 1882, p. 249; 2 Daniell, Ch. Pr. (4th Am. ed.), 982, note 1; Brinckerhoff v. Brown, 7 Johns Ch. 217, 223, at #199; Perkins v. Nichols, 11 Allen, 542, 544; Leeds v. Marine Ins. Co., 2 Wheat. 380, 384.