Translation:On the spacetime lines of a Minkowski world/Paragraph 6

Translation:On the spacetime lines of a Minkowski world
by Friedrich Kottler, translated from German by Wikisource
§ 6. Special spacetime lines: Curves whose three curvatures are constant. Computation of the potentials and fields in generalized coordinates. Constancy of the fields in the generalized reference system
2291642Translation:On the spacetime lines of a Minkowski world — § 6. Special spacetime lines: Curves whose three curvatures are constant. Computation of the potentials and fields in generalized coordinates. Constancy of the fields in the generalized reference systemFriedrich Kottler

If we now go on to consider special motions of a pointlike electron, we have to (by thinking about the metric nature of the relativity principle) study the metrically preferred world lines in advance. These are the curves of constant curvatures. Namely, if any orthogonal transformation of is carried out, then it can be interpreted as a “motion” of , if the determinant of the transformation is +1. With respect to it, however, the individual points of follow trajectories of constant curvature, which can be seen by the fact, that these curves have to allow a displacement into themselves. As trajectories of a one-parameter group of motions, these curves have already been considered by Herglotz during the discussion of the Born rigid body.

Types of curves of constant curvatures. edit

Using suitable coordinate systems, when   is the (real) parameter on the curves, one has:

(A)   (all three constant though):

 

(B)   (both constant);  

 helical lines of  
3.   (Lyon curve of  ).
 

(C)   (constant),   (Born's hyperbolic motion, trajectory of a Lorentz transformation, circle of  ):

 

(D)   (rectilinear uniform translation):

 

The derivation of these types will be given in § 7. They are quickly given here in the form of a family of   trajectories of a one-parameter group of motions. The parameter of the group is  , the parameters of the family are respectively:

(A)  
(B) 1.  ; 2.  ; 3.  ;
(C)  ; (D)  

On can easily see that the expression for the distance between two points   and   remain unchanged, if they are displaced along the respective curves of the family, i.e. the two parameter-triple, which characterize the curve of the family passing through   or  , are unchanged, and the parameter   or   are increased by the same increment   (equi-distance)

Newton's trajectories in , to which these world lines correspond. edit

One finds them by insertion of   and substitution of   instead of  . For details see Herglotz, l.c.

(A) Hyperbolic motion along the  -axis and non-uniform rotation around it.
(B) 1. Uniform rotation around the  -axis.

2. Hyperbolic motion along the z- and non-uniform translation along the  -axis.

3. non-uniform motion along cubic space curves.

(C) Hyperbolic motion
(D) Rectilinear uniform motion

To which types of Newtonian mechanics   they correspond, can only be discussed in § 8.

Constancy of the field in a reference system varying with the light-point. edit

This property has already been given by Sommerfed[1] for hyperbolic motion. It generally holds for all curves of constant curvatures, as we now will demonstrate. To that end, we are using generalized coordinates: the three parameters of any family will be used as generalized spacelike coordinates, the parameter   as generalized timelike coordinate.

Such a property is geometrically predictable: because an orthogonal transformation of   indeed must transform a mimimal line into a minimal line. Thus   and   again mean light-point and reference-point, and

 ,

then also   is effectively located with  . In a suitable reference system which participates with the “motion” of  , nothing could have changed. The nature of this reference system can only be determined in § 8. Here it is sufficient, that the three family parameter of   or   remain unchanged during this motion, while   and   experience the same increase  . Thus during the transport of the potentials and fields to these four generalized coordinates, it has to be shown that these potentials and fields at the reference-point   do not depend on  .

In the following, we will only give the formulas for the potentials and the differentiation formulas stated in § 5, by which the (rather complicated) expressions for the field emerge from the potentials.

(A) edit

 

The transformation matrix reads:

 

The reciprocal matrix reads:

 

From that it follows for the arc-element of   (not to be confused with the arc of the spacetime lines):

 

The applied coordinates are thus oblique-angled.

For the vectors arising in the Wiechert formulas

 [2]

 

one finds:

 

as well as

 

and eventually

 

(  has the parameter line  !)

Thus we have by § 4 (15):

I. Potentials in  : edit

 [3]

Note, that   only appears in the relation  , from which one can conclude that the increase of   and   by   each, leaves the potentials unchanged. Furthermore by § 4 (18):

II. Differentiation formulas: edit

 

By the differentiations, the relation   is therefore not dissolved, and   within that relation will therefore appear in the fields as well. But if   is an arbitrary function in this relation, it follows

 

which was to be proven.

(B) 1. edit

Light-point:

 

Reference-point:

 

The details of the computation are analogous as under A.

I. Potentials: edit

 

II. Differentiation formulas: edit

 

The last line again contains the proof.

(B) 2. edit

Light-point:

 

Reference-point:

 

I. edit

 

II. edit

 

In the last formula the proof is contained again.

(B) 3. edit

Light-point:

 

Reference-point:

 

 

 

 [4]

 

 

In relation to that it has to be remarked, that a decomposition with respect to those parameter lines is physically invalid, because the parameter   is always related to minimal directions instead of spacelike ones. Therefore, we can only conclude the constancy of the potentials and the fields from the things stated above, which result is not influenced by the previous circumstance. We have again:

 

and because of the appearance of   only in the relation  , the proof has been given.

(C) 1. Hyperbolic motion. edit

Light-point:

 

Reference-point:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Furthermore

 

Thus:

1. Potentials: edit

 

 

II. Differentiation formulas: edit

 

In the last line, the proof for the constancy of the field is contained, since   only appears in the relation  .

III. Fields: edit

By § 5 (16)

 

in which

  etc.

or, if we set

 

it follows

 

For the computation of   we have in the present case

 

Thus the remarkable effect arises in hyperbolic motion, that the vector   (of the tangent of the world line of reference point  ) is directed in the parallel direction. We will see, what follows from that. Namely, we have

 

 

Thus the field (  indeed contains, as predicted,   only in the relation  ) is not only constant in the varying reference system (this time, it is a system comoving with the reference-point, as can be easily seen), but it is also purely electrical.

Computation by the method of vectorial splitting of § 1. edit

 

 

furthermore

 

 

which formulas have already been given by Sommerfeld.[5]



  1. Sommerfeld, l. c. (33), p. 673 for the potentials and p. 677 for the fields.
  2.   is the condition for the ratio  ; because   must be timelike.
  3. The   etc. mean the coefficients of  .
  4. Since the Wiechert-Schwarzschild formulas only contain   etc.
  5. L. c. (33), p. 675 and 677.