Nasiryounus
Welcome to Wikisource
Hello, Nasiryounus, and welcome to Wikisource! Thank you for joining the project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- Help pages, especially for proofreading
- Help:Beginner's guide to Wikisource
- Style guide
- Inclusion policy
- Wikisource:For Wikipedians
You may be interested in participating in
Add the code {{active projects}}, {{PotM}} or {{Collaboration/MC}} to your page for current Wikisource projects.
You can put a brief description of your interests on your user page and contributions to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikipedia and Commons.
Have questions? Then please ask them at either
I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikisource, the library that is free for everyone to use! In discussions, please "sign" your comments using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username if you're logged in (or IP address if you are not) and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here (click edit) and place {{helpme}} before your question.
Again, welcome! — billinghurst sDrewth 09:19, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Death of Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi edit
There has been sufficient indicative evidence produced to have a year of death for Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi. Please do not remove that field. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:19, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- A long argument has commenced on the English Wikipedia regarding Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi, you may want to look at it. The consensus reached was that Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi should be listed in the biographies of living people. There have obviously been many articles saying that Shahi has passed, but all articles have different dates of their own according to their own understanding. The common belief is that, because Shahi disappeared, he be listed in the biographies of living people, until however it be found that He has passed.
My edits aren't a nuisance and are based upon thorough research, and a Wikipedia community consensus is involved. -- Nasiryounus (talk) 22:13, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Which bit of "please don't do it" is hard to understand. Would you prefer that the article be fully protected? — billinghurst sDrewth 21:32, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
- That's actually quite offending. I wouldn't mind if the article's fully protected actually, only thing is, then the article won't be as reliable as it should be. Utterly rude. -- Nasiryounus (talk) 19:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- The next time I will protect the page, block your account and the underlying IP address. You have had sufficient warnings. Are we clear? — billinghurst sDrewth 11:15, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Could you kindly answer why you won't change it? Numerous editors from Wikipedia thoroughly researched the matter and all came to the conclusion that due to the man being sighted a dozen times after 2001, 2002 and ever since, it is understood that he has not died, rather in hiding. I only recommend that you make the article more accurate and reasonable to the actual reports which are available on the English Wikipedia. -- Nasiryounus (talk) 01:25, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- The next time I will protect the page, block your account and the underlying IP address. You have had sufficient warnings. Are we clear? — billinghurst sDrewth 11:15, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- That's actually quite offending. I wouldn't mind if the article's fully protected actually, only thing is, then the article won't be as reliable as it should be. Utterly rude. -- Nasiryounus (talk) 19:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC)