Stevenmitchell

Welcome to Wikisource

Hello, Stevenmitchell, and welcome to Wikisource! Thank you for joining the project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• Help pages, especially for proofreading
• Help:Beginner's guide to Wikisource
• Style guide
• Inclusion policy
• Wikisource:For Wikipedians

You may be interested in participating in

• Proofread of the Month
• Monthly Challenge
• Requested texts

Add the code {{active projects}}, {{PotM}} or {{Collaboration/MC}} to your page for current Wikisource projects.

You can put a brief description of your interests on your user page and contributions to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikipedia and Commons.

Have questions? Then please ask them at either

• Wikisource:Scriptorium; or
• Wikisource:Scriptorium/Help

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikisource, the library that is free for everyone to use! In discussions, please "sign" your comments using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username if you're logged in (or IP address if you are not) and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here (click edit) and place {{helpme}} before your question.

Again, welcome! — billinghurst sDrewth 04:59, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikisource

I am sure that the contributors to Wikisource believe that (like Google) they have made a monumental contribution to the preservation of literature. And for many of the editions of contribution they have. However, for the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica they have made it easier to search on-line, but impossible to download. So goes technology I suppose. I am just not certain at all if technology through its digital availability and its impact on the costs and expense of human civilization may in fact be an adverse contribution rather than a progressive one. Certainly the concept of lowering costs through competition hadn't been thought through prior to its modern implementation since its superficial adoption during the Enlightenment. Maybe next time, global planners will spend another half hour or so, in the future when making decisions of Earthly impact. But then again, what are the odds? Stevenmitchell (talk) 22:14, 14 April 2013 (UTC)