Welcome to Wikisource

Hello, Andrew J.Kurbiko, and welcome to Wikisource! Thank you for joining the project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 

You may be interested in participating in

Add the code {{active projects}}, {{PotM}} or {{Collaboration/MC}} to your page for current Wikisource projects.

You can put a brief description of your interests on your user page and contributions to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikipedia and Commons.

Have questions? Then please ask them at either

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikisource, the library that is free for everyone to use! In discussions, please "sign" your comments using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username if you're logged in (or IP address if you are not) and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here (click edit) and place {{helpme}} before your question.

Again, welcome! — billinghurst sDrewth 11:36, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Abdication of Nicholas II edit

What is the source for this English text? Presumably the original was in Russian, so whose English translation is this, and where was it published? --EncycloPetey (talk) 22:42, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Its Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_II_of_Russia#Abdication_(1917). I would publish a link, but from what I know we dont quote other wikiprojects. --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 22:45, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
This text is quoted in numerous respected sources, for example here https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/nov/12/tsar-nicholas-vladimir-lenin-speeches, but its only one of many examples. --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 22:48, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Wikisource requires a reliable published source in public domain for our texts. "Widely quoted" doesn't guarantee that the translation is in the public domain. Without a published source, the text becomes a candidate for deletion. --EncycloPetey (talk) 22:54, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
@EncycloPetey: so, ive found one of those numerous original (1917) publications. and added it to the article. is it good? --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 23:47, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Yes, a dated publication works. Thanks. --EncycloPetey (talk) 00:04, 5 January 2019 (UTC)Reply