Wesboson

Welcome to Wikisource

Hello, Wesboson, and welcome to Wikisource! Thank you for joining the project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• Help pages, especially for proofreading
• Help:Beginner's guide to Wikisource
• Style guide
• Inclusion policy
• Wikisource:For Wikipedians

You may be interested in participating in

• Proofread of the Month
• Monthly Challenge
• Requested texts

Add the code {{active projects}}, {{PotM}} or {{Collaboration/MC}} to your page for current Wikisource projects.

You can put a brief description of your interests on your user page and contributions to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikipedia and Commons.

Have questions? Then please ask them at either

• Wikisource:Scriptorium; or
• Wikisource:Scriptorium/Help

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikisource, the library that is free for everyone to use! In discussions, please "sign" your comments using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username if you're logged in (or IP address if you are not) and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here (click edit) and place {{helpme}} before your question.

Again, welcome! — billinghurst sDrewth 02:53, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you billinghurst. Wesboson (talk) 02:59, 9 January 2017 (UTC).

Smith v. United States (508 U.S. 223)

I have applied a little styling to tidy. Would you please be able to add a source of the text to the talk page of the work, we usually would do that inside {{textinfo}}, and in use of {{header}} on the main ns page add the line | edition = yes to point to it.

Now for US Supreme Court stuff, other aficionados have set up guidance at Wikisource:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases (and I don't claim expertise in this space). I note that most utilise a syllabus at the main, and then put the individual opinion/concurrence/dissent as separate subpages (we love subpages to works here, parent child relationship works nicely), then we can align each specific part of the work with its respective author. Now if that is too much trouble, then don't fuss it, we can work out how we can fix the work to point to the pertinent parts. Do let me know. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC)