Warning Please do not post any new comments on this page.
This is a discussion archive collecting requests for restricted access by Lar.
See current discussion or the archives index.

2007-10 admin

The following discussion is closed:

Appointed


(contributions, logs) While I do have less than 500 contributions, I've been active since mid 2006, participating in various aspects here, and I'd like to increase my participation. There have been quite a few times lately when the delete button would have been useful. I've been helping my wife (Epousesquecido) with her work bringing sources over and a lot of pages didn't end up in the right place on the first try (in part due to some bad advice from me!). Rather than tagging all the resulting needless redirects for speedy, it would be faster to just do that for her myself. I think many of you know me from here and elsewhere, (I am an admin on en:wp, commons and meta, hold checkuser on all three and 'crat on two) and I believe I can be relied upon to not blow up the wiki, and always seek consensus for anything at all likely to be controversial. I'd appreciate your support. ++Lar: t/c 00:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

I forgot to mention that my wiki matrix lists a lot of the stuff I'm involved in. ++Lar: t/c 15:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

2008-10 resignation

Lar (talkcontribs) SUL - SQL

This is notice of my intent to resign my Wikisource adminship. There were far fewer admins when I stood than there are now. The English Wikisource is growing and prospering nicely, and there is a good community of admins here now, which I have been glad to be a part of. I find I have not really used my adminship here the way I intended, and therefore I think it is appropriate to have it removed, to stand aside for others. So I intend to do just that unless there is some strong objection. ++Lar: t/c 18:36, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you all for the kind words. Let me clear up a couple of things. First, if there truly ever was an emergency, as a steward, I could still step in. Stewards have all the admin rights now plus the rename account right that 'crats have, globally. Stewards as a rule do not use them on wikis with active admins/crats, without either permission, or a clear and pressing need, but the power is there. Second, I'm not going anywhere, I just think that the admin situation here is a lot better than it was a year ago and you don't need me as a "just in case" administrator... with my confirmation coming up next month this seemed a good month to handle that. I really do appreciate the voices of support and I really do like this place. But if you really want to strongarm someone from my family into becoming/staying an admin, I think you have a better candidate in E. Go convince her. (maybe you'll have better luck than I did) :) ++Lar: t/c 19:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Lar you have been active at Wikisource:Scriptorium and your adminship on both Wikipedia and Meta, may provide you reason to exercise admin duties here (cross wiki vandalism and such). You are familiar with Wikisource, and stay active enough to pass annual review. There are not enough admins here for 24/7/365 coverage so I would encourage you and the community to work to maintain your admin rights here. Lack of use of the tools do not indicate a need to remove them. Jeepday (talk) 23:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I'm inclined to agree with Jeepday. You're a valuable contributor to the project, and every good admin that we can get, we should keep.
    So I suppose I have to say that I Oppose your retirement. :P EVula // talk // 05:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete! Oh wait, wrong page... You're active; there will come a point in time where you need the tools and it will be annoying because you won't have them. I see no reason why you should resign. In fact, I won't let you resign! :p Jude (talk) 03:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

I got a spare moment: requested and removed. Thanks again for all your kind words. ++Lar: t/c 21:55, 20 October 2008 (UTC)