Talk:Arthur Rackham: A Bibliography

Copyright registered

I see a copyright registration here Google Books for Oct. 2 1936. Have you checked there was no notice on the 1936 original rather than the reprint? I don't see a renewal so I suspect this is {{PD-no-renewal}} rather than no notice? MarkLSteadman (talk) 01:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

(reading commons license poster...) Does that mean it needs to be moved to here?--RaboKarbakian (talk) 01:44, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

It is fine to host on Commons since the origin of the work is the US it is PD in the country of origin as well in the US. MarkLSteadman (talk) 01:46, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

• MarkLSteadman: Assuming the original copyright is legitimate, the original is PD-US-no renewal and the reprint is PD-US-no notice. That can be updated, if necessary. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:12, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

  In general, I am pretty confident than 99% of reprints, 2nd impressions etc. are tagged with the original copyright tags rather than {{PD-US-no-notice}} or {{PD-ineligible}}. For example White Nights and Other Stories, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Metamorphoses (Miller), Nicomachean Ethics (Chase), etc. New editions, (and especially under new titles) may be tagged as such but we generally haven't for reprints (maybe we should create a reprint license similar to {{translation license}} MarkLSteadman (talk) 09:22, 26 October 2021 (UTC)