Welcome to Wikisource

Hello, Fabian Tompsett (MDR), and welcome to Wikisource! Thank you for joining the project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

 

You may be interested in participating in

Add the code {{active projects}}, {{PotM}} or {{Collaboration/MC}} to your page for current Wikisource projects.

You can put a brief description of your interests on your user page and contributions to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikipedia and Commons.

Have questions? Then please ask them at either

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikisource, the library that is free for everyone to use! In discussions, please "sign" your comments using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username if you're logged in (or IP address if you are not) and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here (click edit) and place {{helpme}} before your question.

Again, welcome! Beeswaxcandle (talk) 04:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Nine Days edit

Have you verified that the copyright on this work was not renewed in the United States? --EncycloPetey (talk) 22:35, 14 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes. Fabian Tompsett (MDR) (talk) 22:54, 14 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Have you checked the status of the article at the rear of this? The author name at the top of the article didn't match the one you've given for the rest of the thesis, ( I am being cautious, in relating the OTRS slip you've submitted only to the thesis unless I hear otherwise.)

Who wrote the additional appended article?

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:27, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that - good point, it was Chris' professor, Peter France. As it is barely legible, I shall replace the dejavu file with these two pages deleted, but that will have to be later on as I haven't got the relevant programme on this computer.Fabian Tompsett (MDR) (talk) 15:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Alternatively, you could ask the academic concerned if they would be willing and able to let their article be preserved/transcribed as well. A published review is still "published" material, which could be included on English Wikisource :). And a review of a work by a poet a lot of people are not likely to have heard of is a potential rarer item that should be valued. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:12, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:12, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I thought of that, but the appendix was written in 1986 and is not really integral to the thesis. Fabian Tompsett (MDR) (talk) 04:01, 16 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Want to take a look at it? I transcribed a few pages, but the OCR would help :) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:06, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Annonated transcript? edit

Hi! During the enjoyable talk you gave at wmuk:2017 AGM, you mentioned having created an annotated transcript of The Nine Days. I found this transcript - thanks for making it! But I did not find, or perhaps did not understand what you meant by, the "annotations". Please could you point me to them, and w:WP:NOTIFY me at the same time? Thanks again! Zazpot (talk) 14:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply