File:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf
Link to the index page
Size of this JPG preview of this PDF file: 463 × 599 pixels. Other resolutions: 185 × 240 pixels | 371 × 480 pixels | 593 × 768 pixels | 1,275 × 1,650 pixels.
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 1.62 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 234 pages)
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 16:12, 5 April 2022 | 1,275 × 1,650, 234 pages (1.62 MB) | TE(æ)A,ea. | {{Information |Description=The memorandum opinion of District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan in the case of American Society for Testing and Materials, ''et al.'' v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. |Source=PACER |Date=2022 |Author=Tanya S. Chutkan }} ==Licensing== {{PD-USGov}} |
File usage
More than 100 pages use this file. The following list shows the first 100 pages that use this file only. A full list is available.
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/1
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/10
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/100
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/101
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/11
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/12
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/13
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/14
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/15
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/16
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/17
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/18
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/19
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/2
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/20
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/21
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/22
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/23
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/24
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/25
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/26
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/27
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/28
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/29
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/3
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/30
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/31
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/32
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/33
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/34
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/35
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/36
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/37
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/38
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/39
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/4
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/40
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/41
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/42
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/43
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/44
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/45
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/46
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/47
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/48
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/49
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/5
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/50
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/51
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/52
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/53
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/54
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/55
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/56
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/57
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/58
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/59
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/6
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/60
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/61
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/62
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/63
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/64
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/65
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/66
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/67
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/68
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/69
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/7
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/70
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/71
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/72
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/73
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/74
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/75
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/76
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/77
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/78
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/79
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/8
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/80
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/81
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/82
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/83
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/84
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/85
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/86
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/87
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/88
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/89
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/9
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/90
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/91
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/92
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/93
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/94
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/95
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/96
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/97
- Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/98
View more links to this file.